3 minute read

Religion

Classification As A Scholarly Act

Keeping in mind this relationship between classifier, classification, and that which is classified, it may be seen why a number of contemporary scholars have found the essentialist approach to be unproductive insomuch as its metaphysic presumes a common essence to underlie its varied manifestations—the presumption that motivated an earlier movement known as the Phenomenology of Religion (e.g., van der Leeuw's 1933 work, Religion in Essence and Manifestation). Moreover, just as studies of the politics of scholarship have recently appeared throughout the human sciences, so too in the study of religion once this field was re-conceived as a site constituted by choice and interests rather than one based on sympathetic spiritual insight (e.g., Fitzgerald, Wiebe). Due to the breadth of his own work and its international influence, the University of Chicago's Jonathan Z. Smith is, perhaps, the best representative of this recent development among scholars of religion who now take seriously that "religion" is their analytic tool and that it does not necessarily identify a universal affectation lurking deep within human nature.

Contrary to Max Weber (1864–1920), who famously opened his now classic The Sociology of Religion (1922) by stating that exhaustive description must precede definition, many scholars no longer see classification to be concerned with linking a historical word to an ahistorical trait identified only after all empirical cases have been considered. Instead, classification—like all human activities—is now understood as a tactical, provisional activity, directed by deductive scholarly theories and prior social interests in need of disclosure. Classification ensures that some generic thing stands out as an object worthy of describing; for without a prior definition of religion Weber would have had nothing to describe. To paraphrase Jonathan Z. Smith, classification therefore provides scholars with some elbowroom to get on with their work of disciplined inquiry.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arnal, William E. "Definition." In Guide to the Study of Religion. Edited by Willi Braun and Russell T. McCutcheon. London: Continuum, 2000.

Boyer, Pascal. Religion Explained. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London and New York: Routledge, 1991.

Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen Fields. New York: The Free Press, 1995.

Fitzgerald, Tim. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Lincoln, Bruce. Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Mack, Burton. Christian Myth: Origins, Logic, and Legacy. London: Continuum, 2001.

Masuzawa, Tomoko. The Invention of World Religions, or How the Idea of European Hegemony Came to be Expressed in the Language of Pluralism and Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

McCutcheon, Russell T. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Morris, Brian. Anthropological Studies of Religion: An Introductory Text. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Peterson, Derek, and Darren Walhof, eds. The Invention of Religion: Rethinking Belief in Politics and History. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2001.

Saler, Benson. Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories. Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1993.

Smith, Brian K. Reflections and Resemblance, Ritual, and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Smith, Jonathan Z. "Classification." In Guide to the Study of Religion. Edited by Willi Braun and Russell T. McCutcheon. London: Continuum, 2000.

——. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. The Meaning and End of Religion. Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress Press, 1991.

van der Leeuw, Gerardus. Religion in Essence and Manifestation. 2 vols. Translated by J. E. Turner. New York: Harper and Row, 1963.

Weber, Max. The Sociology of Religion. Introduction by Talcott Parsons and translated by Ephraim Fischoff. Boston: Beacon Press, 1993.

Wiebe, Donald. The Politics of Religious Studies. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.

Russell T. McCutcheon

Additional topics

Science EncyclopediaScience & Philosophy: Reason to RetrovirusReligion - The Beginnings Of "religion", The Essentials Of Religion, The Functions Of Religion, Religion As An Item Of Public Discourse