2 minute read

Taste

The Relationship Between Taste And Personal Taste



The recent understanding of taste (as closer to personal taste and away from the more traditional, realist sense of the word) can still be seen as pointing toward greater authority of the judgment of the individual that was one of the motivators of the original taste theorists. If there is ultimately no way to reasonably, authoritatively, or meaningfully adjudicate among divergent particular judgments or among divergent personal tastes as sets of matters of choice, then the eighteenth-century move toward a fuller respect for individual autonomy in aesthetic judgment has brought us to a point where taste gives way to personal taste. If one believes that Hume failed in his attempt to render consistent the authority of the individual with the call to commonality in judgment, and if one rejects Kant's attempt to solve the antinomy of taste ("taste is at the same time subjective and individual yet also universal") and save aesthetic realism where perhaps Hume was unable to, one may believe that, in these failures, the realist version of a singular, correct definition of taste is rightly abandoned. We may see as continuous with the decision between vanilla and chocolate ice cream a preference for Pink Floyd over Beethoven, Albee over Shakespeare, and Pollock over Rembrandt. Still, the recognition of this continuity is not a cause for surrender to the philosophy of "anything goes." As individuals may reasonably be expected to pursue those experiences that they find rewarding, and to make their investments of aesthetic attention based on predictions derived from patterns of past reward, we will continue to see some degree of commonality in personal judgment. The degree to which we see this—however modestly or subtly—will continue to advance culture positively.



BIBLIOGRAPHY

Addison, Joseph, and Richard Steele. "On the Pleasures of the Imagination." In Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator. Edited by Robert Allen. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1957.

Dickie, George. Evaluating Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.

Goldman, Alan. "The Education of Taste." British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (1990): 105–116.

Hume, David. Of the Standard of Taste and Other Essays. Edited by J. W. Lenz. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. New York: Garland, 1971.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Foreword by Mary J. Gregor. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.

Kivy, Peter. "Recent Scholarship and the British Tradition: A Logic of Taste, The First Fifty Years." In Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, edited by G. Dickie, R. Sclafani, and R. Roblin. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's, 1989.

Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964.

Sibley, Frank. "Aesthetic Concepts." Philosophical Review 68 (Oct. 1959): 421–450.

David E. W. Fenner

Additional topics

Science EncyclopediaScience & Philosophy: Swim bladder (air bladder) to ThalliumTaste - Taste, Personal Taste, The Relationship Between Taste And Personal Taste, Bibliography