Other Free Encyclopedias » Science Encyclopedia » Science & Philosophy: Ephemeris to Evolution - Historical Background

Ethnicity and Race in Africa - Race In Africa, The Concept Of Ethnicity, Ethnicity Debates In Africa, Ethnic Experiments In Africa

people differences racism social

There is an abiding paradox in the concept of race. It is a biological fiction but a social reality. Biologically it is now established beyond doubt that there are no distinct races among human beings and that the genetic variation within particular groups of people is much higher than between groups. The view that people possess inherent personality characteristics attached to particular irreducible phenotypes has been systematically discredited, yet the outward appearance of people still plays a profound social role in the manner in which different people relate to each other. These readily perceived phenotypical differences are often the bases upon which people construct social differences between themselves. Skin color is the most obvious of these differences. The apartheid (translates as "separateness") regime in South Africa represented the clearest possible expression of the political use of skin color to discriminate against blacks, by disenfranchising them, excluding them from the central institutions of the state, and by ensuring that they would be available as cheap labor in the mines, on the farms, and in the factories.

The instrumental use of race as a convenient means to attain political and economic goals was forcefully articulated by Oliver Cox when he insisted that race should be defined socially, not biologically, since it connotes social relations of exploitation between people and not biological differences. There is an ongoing debate about the origin of the concept of race and its adjuncts, racism and racialism. While some argue that these are concepts that are as old as humanity itself, others argue that they arose as a direct result of the modern era and are intimately connected to colonial conquest and the slave trade. Anthony Appiah has drawn an interesting distinction between racialism and racism. Racism refers to negative varieties of discrimination on the basis of an ideology that orders society into a hierarchy of supremacy and domination, where some people may see others as inherently inferior on the basis of an undefined racial essence. It has both an institutionalized form (for example, apartheid) and an interpersonal presence. Racism thus consists of the view that this unspecified racial essence translates into certain inherent, usually objectionable properties (such as laziness, filth, lack of punctuality, and so on) that justify treating people differently, usually unequally. On the other hand, racialism refers to the recognition of physical difference between people as being socially and psychologically significant in the sense that they share certain traits and characteristics, but without attaching any inherently inferior or superior characteristics to different people. Many argue that this position is debatable, suggesting that perceiving such differences almost invariably implies the acceptance of inequality between people.

Ethnicity and Race in Anthropology - Franz Boas, Ethnicity, And Contemporary Physical Anthropology: Continuing Tensions, Cultural Fundamentalism And Instrumental Ethnicities [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

Uh, the earliest anatomically modern homo sapiens sapiens remains are only just over 100,000 years old and are found in both Africa and the Near East. They are not 5 million years old! LOL Not even close.

http://www.biologyreference.com/Ho-La/Human-Evolution.html

The earliest Caucasoid remains are also about 31,000 years old whereas the earliest Negroid remains are much younger, dating back to only 12,500-14,500 years ago. So who's it really "too early" for?

http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/08/earliest-examples-of-four-major-racial.html

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

The consept that the original fossils found in Africa were those of white people is a foolish joke. White people do not come onto the scene until approximately 20,000BC and the fossils in question date back to 5 million years ago. Its too early for the Whiteman.

Vote down Vote up

over 8 years ago

The fossil remains found in Kenya and East Africa at large weren't of the Bantu/Negroid race. They were very much Caucasoid per Howells, Coon, Cole, Leakey, and just about every expert that had a chance to observe them. Furthermore, the people that are thought to have spawned all non-Africans are Ethiopians and Somalis, not blacks. This is why Ethiopians and Somalis are genetically intermediate between Africans and non-Africans, and blacks are not. In fact, Bantus/Negroids didn't even exist until not that long ago. They were at the time of the East African fossil remains still a part of the Pygmy population of West Africa, a race from which they split only a few thousand years ago and only later spread to other parts of Africa from which they were up until then entirely absent. Read up on the true origins of blacks here:

http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2008/02/origins-of-black-africans.html

Vote down Vote up

over 9 years ago

race in Africa is traced back to the existance of human being,nand the leading race in Africa is bantu who believed to originate from Nigeria and Cameroon,The theory of evolution of man tells us that,the fossils discovered in kenya at fort Ternan belived to be the human dynasty,whic also regarded to be the from the bantu RACE,the appearence alone is what descibes ones RACE,example,in Africa we had the following race,khoisan,pygmies,erythriotes or ethiopids,mongolids,bantu or negro,caucasian.these are races from africa