Other Free Encyclopedias » Science Encyclopedia » Science & Philosophy: Habit memory: to Heterodont » Heliocentric Theory - The Copernican Revival Of The Heliocentric Theory, The Triumph Of The Heliocentric Theory, The Heliocentric Theory And The Universe

Heliocentric Theory - The Triumph Of The Heliocentric Theory

earth sun solar system

Johannes Kepler's (1571-1630) work enabled the heliocentric solar system model to accurately match and predict planetary positions on the zodiac for many centuries. After trying many geometric curves and solids in Copernicus's heliocentric model to match earlier observations of planetary positions, Kepler found that the model would match the observed planetary positions if the Sun is placed at one focus of elliptical planetary obits. This is Kepler's First Law of Planetary Motion. Kepler's three laws of planetary motion allow accurate matches and predictions of planetary positions.

Almost simultaneously, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) built a small refracting telescope and began astronomical observations in 1609. Several of his observations lent support to Kepler's heliocentric theory:

  1. Galileo discovered the four satellites of Jupiter (Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto in order of increasing distance from Jupiter) in 1610. Their orbits around Jupiter showed that Jupiter and Earth were centers of orbital motion for celestial bodies (geocentric theory assumed that celestial bodies revolve only around Earth).
  2. Galileo observed the disks of at least several planets. His observations of Venus's disk were especially important for determining whether the geocentric or heliocentric model was correct for the solar system. Ptolemy's geocentric model predicts that Venus's disk will show only the new Moon (dark) and crescent phases as it orbits Earth on its epicycle(s) and deferent (see Fig. 2). Kepler's modified Copernican heliocentric model predicts that Venus's disk will show all the phases of the Moon (including the half-moon, gibbous, and full Moon phases; see Fig. 3) as Venus and Earth both orbit the Sun. Galileo observed the second possibility for Venus's disk, which supported the heliocentric theory. The enormous variations in the angular size of Mars could not be explained by a circular orbit about Earth, but were easily understood if Mars orbits the Sun instead, thus varying its distance from Earth by a factor of five from the closest approach to the most distant retreat.

On the basis of these observational discoveries, Galileo began to teach the modified Copernican heliocentric model of the solar system as the correct one. He even used Kepler's laws to calculate orbital parameters for the orbits of the satellites revolving around Jupiter. However, direct proof that Earth moves around the Sun was still lacking. Furthermore, the Catholic Church considered Galileo's heliocentric theory to be heretical. It placed Copernicus's book on its Index of Restricted Books and tried Galileo before the Inquisition. Galileo was forced to recant the heliocentric theory and was placed under house arrest for the last eight years of his life.

The next major development was the generalization of Kepler's laws in 1687 by Isaac Newton (1642-1727). His generalized form of Kepler's laws showed that the Sun and planets all revolve around the solar system's center of mass. Telescopic observations of solar system objects gave indications of their size and when used in the generalized Kepler's laws, soon showed that the Sun is much larger and more massive than even Jupiter (the largest and most massive planet). Thus the center of the solar system, around which Earth revolves, is always in or near the Sun. Earth orbits the Sun much more than the Sun orbits Earth.

Another demonstration of Earth's orbital motion is the aberration of starlight. Astronomical observations and celestial mechanics indicate that Earth should have a 16-19 mi/sec (25-30 km/sec) orbital velocity around the solar system's center which continuously changes its direction due to the gravitational effect of the Sun. James Bradley's (1693-1762) attempt to determine the parallaxes Figure 1. Illustration of how the angle PEC "opens up" as Earth approaches Castor (C) and Pollux (P) as it moves from position E1 in its orbit around the Sun in September to E2 in January, then PEC "closes up" as the Earth moves from E2 to its position E3 in early June. The distance PC between Castor and Pollux is assumed to be fixed on the celestial sphere. Illustration by Hans & Cassidy. Courtesy of Gale Group.
of stars starting in 1725 with a telescope rigidly fixed in a chimney soon found that the apparent positions of the stars shifted along elliptical paths. These ellipses were 90° out of phase with the parallax ellipse for a nearby star on a distant background that is expected to be produced by Earth's motion around the Sun. Moreover the ellipses' semi-major axes were always 20.5", with no variation from the different distances of the stars. These same size ellipses were soon understood to be the yearly paths of the aberrations of the apparent positions of the stars caused by the addition of Earth's constantly changing orbital velocity to the vacuum velocity of the light arriving from the stars (whose true positions are at the centers of the aberrational ellipses). These ellipses show that Earth does indeed have the expected orbital velocity around the solar system's center of mass.

Final proof of the heliocentric theory for the solar system came in 1838, when F.W. Bessel (1784-1846) determined the first firm trigonometric parallax for the two stars of 61 Cygni (Gliese 820). Their parallax (difference in apparent direction of an object as seen from two different points) ellipses were consistent with orbital motion of Earth around the Sun.

In 1835 the Catholic Church removed Copernicus's book from its index of restricted books. It is fitting to mention Copernicus's book here. Bessel's successful measurement of a parallax ellipse established the Sun as the central body of the solar system, but it was not certain that the Sun was at or near the center of the universe.


Heliocentric Theory - The Heliocentric Theory And The Universe [next] [back] Heliocentric Theory - The Copernican Revival Of The Heliocentric Theory

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 2 years ago

this is very goooooood and bad

Vote down Vote up

over 2 years ago

I like it because it is goooooood :-)



Vote down Vote up

over 1 year ago

this article is very good

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

oh! this article helps me lot!

Vote down Vote up

almost 8 years ago

Could you explain the second piece of evidence from Galileo? I don't understand it very well.

Vote down Vote up

over 2 years ago

I love mr shreeve and his juices butt

Vote down Vote up

about 8 years ago

Kyle, even though I'm about 1 year late, The Roman Catholic Church played a role against the evolution of the theory of heliocentrism, or the theory that the sun is at the center of the solar system.

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

The main motive for Kepler's discoveries was to adjust the recorded observations to take account of Copernicus's discovery that the Earth as the observation point was not stationary but orbited round the Sun.

Vote down Vote up

over 10 years ago

I need help. I am a senior in high school and have to have a debate on heliocentric vs. geocentric. I could use some good points.

Vote down Vote up

over 1 year ago

આ માટે આભાર

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

thuaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Vote down Vote up

over 6 years ago

it dosn't help us compare it to ptolemy's theory for a project it needs to tell us why he believed in this and the proof of why he believes it.

Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

ey yo

Vote down Vote up

about 8 years ago

I have searched for geocentric proof and I have only found useless babbling about how "they have lied" and "the earth is in the center."
This makes me believe the Heliocentric theory more. It has proof.

Vote down Vote up

over 9 years ago

i have a science assignment and i need help with a question:reflect the influence of the catholic church on the development of the theory of the solar system

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

hi

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

I hate you!

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

hola

Vote down Vote up

over 5 years ago

ermergurd!!!!!!!!!!

Vote down Vote up

over 5 years ago

this is awesomeeeeeeeeeee no but its realy dumb ermergurd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Vote down Vote up

about 1 year ago

This article is rather behind. The Mach Principal states that all planetary motion calculations can be done validly from either from a heliocentric or geocentric reference frame. Although I question many of Einstein's Special Relativity assumptions, I find intertial reference frame conversions valid, which supported Mach's calculations. As a result NASA uses geocentric orbital calculations, since they simplify them greatly with an earth-centered reference frame. Galileo's findings a really summed up as little obects orbit bigger objects. This of course is quite simplistic. Objects orbit their center of gravity, to be precise. And since one cannot possibly sum the weight of all object in the universe to establish the universe's center, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey is a tempting simplification, and then combine with the true meaning of Airy's Failure 1871, Michelson-Morely 1887, Sagnac 1913, and Michelson-Gale 1925, following the scientific evidence, it seems the Earth may indeed be at the center of the universe and stationary as the ether and the stars rotate around it.

Vote down Vote up

about 1 year ago

fuhufhfuvhfvhfuvfvhvvvn nfmnfztghbvfrgbgthvfdhjvfrthjbvghjbvfdrhbvc

Vote down Vote up

almost 2 years ago

poop

Vote down Vote up

over 2 years ago

Hello

Vote down Vote up

4 months ago

my question is how can we use the aberration observation to refute the ptolemaic model of solar system?

Vote down Vote up

9 months ago

heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeey that's pretty good

Vote down Vote up

12 months ago

hi im in middle school doping work nd only 11 that sounds resanable