Other Free Encyclopedias » Science Encyclopedia » Science & Philosophy: Methane to Molecular clock » Modernization Theory - Defining Modernization Theory, Applying Modernization Theory, Globalization Theory, Contemporary Theories, Bibliography

Modernization Theory - Defining Modernization Theory

modernized societies science social

Disagreements about what modernization theory is and what has been learned from comparisons bedevil discussions between users and critics. Those who applied the theory often failed to be specific or to supply supporting explanations to establish it as a powerful set of generalizations in the forefront of cross-disciplinary social science analysis, while critics usually neglected to define the theory precisely or to make an effort to balance its merits against alleged shortcomings. Although the theory exerted a huge impact on the disciplines of history, political science, and sociology, and on thinking about capitalism versus socialism, East Asia versus Western advanced capitalist countries, and more versus less developed countries, to many its legacy remains confusing, as does its connection to recent globalization theory. Even at the beginning of the twenty-first century, there is little agreement on what modernization theory is and how it has advanced social science analysis.

The theory of modernization normally consists of three parts: (1) identification of types of societies, and explanation of how those designated as modernized or relatively modernized differ from others; (2) specification of how societies become modernized, comparing factors that are more or less conducive to transformation; and (3) generalizations about how the parts of a modernized society fit together, involving comparisons of stages of modernization and types of modernized societies with clarity about prospects for further modernization. Actually, reasoning about all of these issues predated postwar theory. From the Industrial Revolution, there were recurrent arguments that a different type of society had been created, that other societies were either to be left permanently behind or to find a way to achieve a similar transformation, and that not all modernizing societies had equal success in sustaining the process due to differences in economic, political, and other institutions. In the middle of the 1950s, these themes acquired new social science and political casting with the claim of increased rigor in analysis.

In the early post–World War II era, approximately twenty societies were regarded as highly modernized and roughly another ten to twenty were depicted as having passed a threshold on the path to modernization. Definitions of modernized varied. Some noted structural features, such as levels of education, urbanization, use of inanimate sources of energy, and fertility. Others pointed to attitudes, such as secularization, achievement orientation, functional specificity in formal organizations, and acceptance of equality in relationships. Conscious of the ethnocentric nature of many earlier explanations for growth in national power and income, social scientists in the 1950s and 1960s generally omitted cultural traits associated closely with Western history from definitions of modernity. Yet, given the rhetoric of the Cold War and a preoccupation with democracy in U.S. national identity, political institutions became a central factor in many definitions.

Modernization Theory - Applying Modernization Theory [next]

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 8 years ago

i am a 19 year old student of the prestigeous ahmadu bello university and has found this material most intresting and explanatory thanks for the info meena

Vote down Vote up

over 7 years ago

the modernization theory is ahistorical and atheoretical in that it does not take into account some of the factors that have owned growth and development to the developed countries such as colonisation and slavery.if the developing countries are to follow the us path of development who are they to colonize or enslave?

Vote down Vote up

almost 4 years ago


Vote down Vote up

over 9 years ago

I am a 56 year old woman with many interests. I have been dabbling in possibly going back to college to study sociology and psychology. These areas interest me much so I was searching today for some interesting facts and I found this site. Great publication of facts surrounding the theories of modernization. I appreciate my computer and the many place such as this that I can accumulate knowledge from my desktop. Thank you for the thoroughness of this text in information. Vickie

Vote down Vote up

about 1 year ago

I have been working in developmental organization and emergency humanitarian organizations